It would seem to me that the wood cut pictures we have of pyrates is hardly a basis for deciding wether or not sailors in the GAoP actually wore boots or not. Woodcuts are not photos and were not made by anyone actually at an event, so whoever made these woodcuts would have been drawing on thier mental image of what this person looked like or personal accounts from others. I would also imagine that these woodcuts were made and used in books written for the general public and a certain amount of embelishment would have probably taken place on the artist's part. As an example, the picture of Anne Bonney, she surely wouldn't have had her breast's exposed. At any rate I would think if a pyrate of that time came across a pair of boots, common or not, they would have picked said footwear over shoes out of practicality. We must also take into account the fact that a far greater number of written records did not survive as compared to did survive for us to study. The point is we'll never know, and given the nature of pyrates in general, if one had the chance to have a pair of boots they would probably have worn them. I personally have a pair of boots from CA Boots and wouldn't trade them for the world, BUT I do not do any historical re-enactment. I f I were to start (which would require me to move since I live in Ohio) I would buy a nice pair of straight lasted shoes and stockings, but since I only get the chance to attend pyrate "events" I like my bucket boots just fine. -Lazarus