Jump to content

redhand

Member
  • Posts

    184
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by redhand

  1. It's a pirate ART sketchbook mate, 16 pages of art, all the same style....

    all of 'em are pirates; men, women....and pirate skeletons!

    $10 bucks for the SIGNED sketchbook, $20 if ya want the one with the original artwork in it.

    Doesn't seem like much of a reach ta me...You ain't gonna find a piece of original art by

    a professional artist for under $20 bucks.....I guarantee it!

  2. I'm offering for sale some of my "Pirate Drawings" collector sketchbooks.

    I have a limited quantity of these books (5x8.5"), each book has 8 total pages

    of my pirate drawings...that's 16 total pages of artwork; which includes 4 pages

    of full color artwork, plus a full color cover. These books are all signed by me,

    and a few of them (25) are offered as a "limited edition" with an alternate cover.

    These are also signed and numbered, I have only a few copies of this edition left!

    Prices are $10 for the standard edition (skull & Cross bones cover), plus $3 S&H

    pirateskullcover100.jpg

    The Alternate cover, signed & numbered, Limited edition of 25 (plus 10 APs)

    it is priced at $20, and comes with a full color miniature Pirate print and

    a sketch card with one of my original drawings on it.

    S&H is $3, each booklet comes sealed in a mylar bag with a backing board.

    I also have some original Pirate art available for sale;

    My original art is priced between $25 to $75 for B&W pieces, most all pieces

    were done originally as "convention sketches", which I did during WonderCon 2010.

    Color pieces run from $75 TO $350, depending on size.

    Contact me for images of available original work.

    Here's a few images of what the book looks like; inside & out

    (the cover shown here is the Alternate cover)

    PyratebookAltcover100.jpg

    "Fightin the Dutch"-color illustration for book-original available; $350 plus S&H

    fightinthedutch4C-Fin100.jpg

    "Blackbeard" convention sketch-$40, plus $3 S&H

    31243_1460182831094_1429127856_1218.jpg

    "Repell Boarders!" ink drawing, straight from the sketchbook-$50, plus $3 S&H

    31243_1460212551837_1429127856_1218.jpg

  3. Guys-

    You do NOT have to have a special license ot own, sell, possess

    a reproduction flintlock or caplock firearm (they fall into the Antique

    firearm rule pre 1898) That's why, you can buy them through the mail

    and do not have to have a FFL to purchase them. As for black powder...

    you can buy that at any store that carries it....That being said, some stores

    refuse to carry it, because the feds make them purchase an entirely seperrate

    license to carry/sell BP, that's why you'll see most sporting goods places carrying

    Goex, or something similar, and NOT BP. Filling the venthole on a working firelock

    just turned that $200 to $300 dollar firearm into a paperweight, you'd have been

    MUCH better off with a replica, if in fact you did have a working firelock.

    always check your local state laws before ordering/buying that new pistol...

    in some states it may indeed be cheaper in the long run to have a non-firing

    replica.

    -Redhand

  4. Just saw this thread...Nice work everybody!

    Josh, like yer painting, very cool.

    Lady Barbossa....yer pencils ar excellent!, they

    are really loose and very well done. They remind me

    of Ben Stahl's work....he was one of the artists/instructors

    who wrote the Famous Artists corrospondence course books

    in the 50s and 60s. Nice stuff!

    Here's a link to my website as well as

    to my photobucket site, where I keep a lot of

    sketches and other items.

    jnp63 photo album - Photobucket.com

    www.prechtelfineart.com

    -Redhand

  5. Stirling-

    Exacxtly as Daniel describes, the Calvenists believed

    in predestination, in example: Jusdas was predestined

    to betray christ.The puratins were so busy trying to PREVENT

    sin, arther than focusing on having your sins forgiven, as Daniel

    previously described. The irony of their religious sect is that

    they came over from Holland to escape the persecution from

    the church in England, only to Immediately start persecuting

    the indians, and anybody else they saw, that didn't agree

    with their moral compass.

    The Moravians, weren't to far away from getting here, 1730s I think.

    I believe the first 1st of what they called the "Great Awakenings"...

    of the revivalist movements, was around 1710 maybe...possibly

    a little aerlier, there was also one in the 1740s. I believe Dr. Byrd

    tells a rather droll tale of a traveling experience with a "new ager"

    during one of his travels. THAT is a great book....I believe it's titled

    Colonial American Travel Narratives, it's available through

    peguine books, they have a fair amount of 1st person accounts in print.

    -Redhand

  6. Oh you want to talk PYRATES....then just start a list

    of 17th & 18th century Bay colony BUSSINESS MEN!! B)

    Thery were notorious even in THEIR day as pirates!

    -Redhand

  7. I believe they have pretty much disproved the

    mold/bacterial theory, on grounds I believe

    that it would have been totally inedible.

    The lady author who wrote "In the Devil's Snare"

    makes a very strong argument for the "indian"

    theory. See my above statement.

    -Redhand

  8. Kass, Jib-

    The New Engald witch hunts, were a mix of land

    and property grabs, as well as a convenient excuse

    to remove a disagreeable neighbor, or other "unsavory"

    person from the town/countryside. The catalyst for the

    whole thing derives not from tainted grain, but from

    the Native indians....or rather the puratin's fears there of.

    three of four of the girls in the original group that started

    the Salem hysteria, were refugees from the frontier. The

    puratins had a STRONG fear of the indians being satan's

    minions....well they had strong fears about LOTS of stuff

    in the new world. They did a lot of tranferrence of fears,

    to things and people around them. The Mather brothers

    really did an excellent job of fueling the fire with their

    "fears". A really good book that addresses this is called

    "In the Devil's Snare" ....written by a woman who's name

    eludes me at present.

    A very interesting subject tho.

    -Redhand

  9. Joshua-

    Too me it sounds like he's confusing Light Bob

    caps with something else....I've never heard of any

    sailors or Marines wearing a leather jockey style helmut...

    but then I certainly haven't read EVERYTHING! B)

    Interesting quote about the hair....sounds almost like

    a Hessian....REALLY long que....I suppose on long tedious

    voyages, one must have had to of had some diversion.

    Also the quote about the petticoat breeches is interesting...

    the turning them 'round bit...waste not...want not I suppose.

    Thanks for posting that.

    -Redhand

  10. Kass-

    I can tell you...being a dyed in the wool Presbyterian,

    the the modern Presbytery resembles ab-so-lutely NOTHING

    to what the original doctorin was. Our church is pretty middle

    of the road, compared to the rest of the presbytery. The original

    church was pretty stern, and was TOTALLY patterned off the puritan

    church. In fact up to and including the American Revolution, the

    Presbyterian church was probably one of the most popular of religious

    faiths at the time. This held true pretty much up to the American

    Civil war, when it started to finally "loosen" up, shall we say.

    The Mather bros. were a scary lot....take a look at their Dogma

    some time....What makes me laugh is that they (the puratins)

    came over here to escape religious percecution...and IMMEDIATLY

    started percecuting the indians. Can we all say IRONY....I think we can.

    -Redhand

  11. The puritan based religion was alive

    and well, clear into the middle 19th century.

    The Prebyterian church's doctrain was based

    on the "puritan" belief and ideology.

    Up through the time of the American civil war,

    the Presbyterian church remained a bastion of

    stern rightiousness, mirroring the early puratin church.

    The puratins may well have not been in power

    in England after James took over, but they sure ruled

    NEW ENGLAND with an irion fist and will. Cotton Mather

    and his bretheren....whose names escape me at the moment

    were the hierarchy of that church, he and his brothers were

    responsible for more spin doctoring than anyone in modern

    times I can think of....more like the Tony Sopranos of their time.

    Mather's brother in law, John Williams and Williams' family

    were all taken captive during the Deerfield raid in 1704.

    John William's Wife and child were killed during the long

    winter trek to Canada. His daughter Eunice was adopted

    into one of the indian tribes, and spent the rest of her life

    married to (his name escapes me now also) I believe he was

    Seneca, or Wabanaki? Anyway, there's a great book called the

    "Unredeemed Captive" about her, and her father's unsuccessfull

    attempts to gain her "freedom".

    Another great site visit, that will give you some good insight into

    the culture of 1704 New England, is:

    http://1704.deerfield.history.museum/home.do

    Redhand

  12. Not having posted in quite a few months...

    this post is certainly interesting from the visual

    standpoint, so I thought I'd add my 2ยข.

    Certainly as Foxe stated, it's hard to ascertain

    what exactly is going on in the picture, by merely

    looking at it without any sort of explination.

    That being said....Here goes....

    To me, it looks like the man on the right may be Indian,

    by that I mean a Hindi, I would base this on the hairstyle,

    the loose pantaloons, and what look like well fitted

    boots of some sort (not bucket however :lol: )

    I certainly could be all awash here, but the "look"

    of the pirate....facial hair, hairstyle, features, and

    clothing as well as arms, certainly looks indian to me.

    Basing my assesment on period woodcuts and artwork...

    tho the one thing missing is a the very distinct turban.

    Interesting post however.

    -Redhand

  13. Corsair-

    The Virginia Runaways is an excellent site to

    find reference for various things, especially clothing

    descriptions, but mostly from the mid-Atlantic states,

    with almost exclusive emphasis on Virginia.

    There are some other extant examples of "runaway" ads,

    from various other colonies....I'll try and find the links also.

    Here's the virginia runaway linkvirginia runaways page

    They cover the 1730s up through the american revolution

    Hope this helps. Also check out www.historicaltrekking.com

    on their "Links" page they have a resource section, that has

    merchants and other listings you may find helpful

    Cheers

    Redhand

  14. The French seemed too adapt to tattooing, or

    permanently marking themselves (tattu being a polonysian word)

    after the fashion of the indians in the new world. French sailors of

    the mid-to late 18th century marked themselves with nautical stars

    as well as all manner of religious markings; cruciforms, hearts, fish,

    and lettering such as INRI, and etc.

    More than likely these were french sailors

    who were catholic. The men who traded with the indians

    were also more likely to adopt indian style tattoos, as well as

    the religious themed ones. The french for whatever reason

    seemed more willingly influenced by the native culture,

    including tattooing than did their english competition.

    I guess that puritanical or Calvanist religious upbringing

    squelched the "desire" for marking themselves, as far

    as the common 17th & early 18th century englishman goes.

    -RH

  15. Gentlemen....and Ladies :rolleyes:

    Bear in mine that even some of the most learned gentlemen

    were oft times bad spillers, spellers, spallers, spaylers.....

    The county/regional venacular often surfaced when writing,

    thus in example, TEACH, became Thatch That Thaych, etc, etc.

    Just something to think about.

    Cheers

    Redhand

  16. Also try Plunkett & McCleane...starring Johnny Lee Miller

    and Robert Carlisle...story of two real highwaymen in 1740's

    England, fantastic costuming (mostly) and a great feel for

    London of the period. Geared towards the MTV crowd

    with humor & anachronistic references.

    Also try and lay hands on the BBC production

    of Moll Flanders (NOT that abysmal hollywood production)

    It's a bit bawdy, but well acted and the costumes and

    feel for the time period (1680-1700) is fantastic!!

    Both of these productions have a great sense of

    "Hogarthian" England. Hogarth was a artist and social

    comentator of his time, 1740-1770's England.

    Cheers

    Redhand

  17. Good words Hawkyns!

    Tips hat to Hawkyns & Cascabel...gentelmen. :(

    I too would rather see...if one is portraying a

    truely authentic "pirate" of the early 18th century

    or late 17th, see you dressed as a common sailor of the time.

    If you feel the need to embellish, ie a more "fantastical" type

    pirate, like Hook or what have you...then go with god and have

    a good time, I shant loo down my nose at you for it. But I also

    think that the public deserves to know the difference between

    "street theatre" costuming and historical interpretation, and it's

    our duty, depending on what type event we're at, to show them

    the difference. Just my humble opinion.

    One final note.....I truely wish this term "stitch NAZI" would be

    permenently stowed below decks! I find any reference to me, or

    anyone else who enjoys historical accuracy being referenced to

    a Nazi, fairly distasteful! A stich counter I gladly am, Nazi, I am NOT!

    Cheers all.

    Redhand

  18. I recently bought a couple of props from a local costumer who has

    hollywood conections, and who stil on occasion does movie costuming.

    She had a set of clothes used on a bad movie "Robinson Caruso"

    starring Pierce Brosnan. I wound up with his Gillet and a pair of

    buckskin gauntlets. Plus I got a rubber musketoon that was used

    by one of Tavinton's men in the Patriot. All pretty cool stuff.

    The gillet and the gauntlets have been artificially aged, the gillet

    has been sanded in may places to give it the "shipwrecked" look.

    It's a great material; black with gold embroider....I wish it was

    in better condition...it's still usable for that "ratty" piratical look! :lol:

    A lot of the way a prop looks and it's construction has to do

    with whether it's being used in the foreground or waaay in

    the background shots, and of course film budget!

    Redhand

  19. TOTW is a little quicker too I think than

    the rifle shoppe, as far as turn around.

    Here's a link to Jim Chambers firelocks,

    his are mostly rifles, but there's a few fowlers

    and a nice early militia/Commitee of safety style musket,

    plus he has many locks and parts available...including

    a "how to" video http://www.flintlocks.com

    Redhand

  20. Kass-

    Don't forget those Highwaymen!

    There are several book that deal with the lives

    of those scoundrels, many of which were

    gentlemen who had fallen on hard times, or were

    looking for a bit of adventure....much like land-locked

    pirates, mostly late 1600 to early mid 1700's.

    One of the books I have on the subject is "Stand & Deliver"

    which I picked up at a used book shop, is a interesting

    biography of many of the well known, and some not so

    well known highwaymen, ie: Plunkett & MacKlean,

    Dick Turpin and others. Mostly they wound up doing

    the Tyburn jig! I'll check my library for some other titles.

    Cheers

    Redhand

×
×
  • Create New...
&ev=PageView&noscript=1"/>