Capt Thighbiter Posted June 14, 2008 Share Posted June 14, 2008 Someone has told me that since shirts in the GAoP were considered underclothes, walking about with shirttails un-tucked in would be considered like wearing ones underwear over your parts in modern times. True or not? I put the question to those better informed then myself ( not to hard to find that, eh?) Pirate music at it's best, from 1650 onwards The Brigands Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dutchman Posted June 14, 2008 Share Posted June 14, 2008 true in society unless you were so poor you did not have pants of some sort or thats what was done in your region ie field workers- aboard ship working, not so sure.- not common but did happen, i'll have to dig back and find the book but -mr x who was sickly took to his daily chores wearing his shirt- not the exact quote but close. i think wearing one loose on deck would work, but i'd be a bit nervous in the rigging with a tail flapping like a penant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bully MacGraw Posted June 17, 2008 Share Posted June 17, 2008 Shirts are always tucked in 100% of the time UNLESS, they were an outergarment! That is just a shirt a bit larger with perhaps heavier fabric. This would be worn over everything Cheers Those destined to hang, shall not fear drowning Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now