Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I saw this earlier today - what a great find. (I wasn't even aware that they had buried anyone at Stonehenge, even for just a century as previously believed.)

RHJMap.jpg

Posted

Huh. I've been there and I don't remember anything about them finding cremated bodies. (Which may actually say more about my memory than anything. Although I would think I would have remembered something about finding remains...)

"Team member Andrew Chamberlain suggested that that the cremation burials represent the natural deaths of a single elite family and its descendants, perhaps a ruling dynasty.

A clue to this, he said, is the small number of burials in Stonehenge's earliest phase, a number that grows larger in subsequent centuries, as offspring would have multiplied.

Parker Pearson added: "I don't think it was the common people getting buried at Stonehenge — it was clearly a special place at that time. One has to assume anyone buried there had some good credentials."

I think that's quite a reach on the part of the scientists. People could have been buried there for any number of reasons which we can't even begin to grasp. Heck, it could have just been a small village's burial plot. Curious that the bodies were buried before the stones were put up - what if the stones are nothing more than a monument to the dead and the arrangement is not really relevant to their original purpose? (They go on and on about the arrangement of the stones in the audio presentation on-site.)

"I am so clever that sometimes I don't understand a single word of what I am saying.” -Oscar Wilde

"If we all worked on the assumption that what is accepted is really true, there would be little hope of advance." -Orville Wright

gallery_1929_23_24448.jpg

Posted

In the same context of that idea and the other context that it was a 'temple' to the elements, seasons or equinoxes, perhaps it is both. by that I mean guiding the dead in some way in either receiving light, following, or giving something back to the living.

Well it makes sense to me, don't know about anyone else...

Posted

The June National Geographic article is much less focused on this "city of the dead" idea. It gives a bit of airing to a couple of current theories, which is a good scientific way to approach things.

I too visited Stonehenge a few years back and don't remember anything about it being a burial site, so this might be relatively new information.

I'm curious if they've excavated other areas of plains, maybe there are bodies all over, so the Stonehenge ones are nothing special. :unsure:

Posted

I like the idea that Stonehenge is still an enigma. It has stood for centuries, doesn't give up it's secrets easily, and the bottom line is, scientist still don't know for certain what it was for.

Not all mysteries are meant to be solved. <_<

...schooners, islands, and maroons

and buccaneers and buried gold...

RAKEHELL-1.jpg

You can do everything right, strictly according to procedure, on the ocean, and it'll still kill you. But if you're a good navigator, a least you'll know where you were when you died.......From The Ship Killer by Justin Scott.

"Well, that's just maddeningly unhelpful."....Captain Jack Sparrow

Found in the Ruins — Unique Jewelry

Found in the Ruins — Personal Blog

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...
&ev=PageView&cd%5Bitem_id%5D=12836&cd%5Bitem_name%5D=Stonehenge+discovery....&cd%5Bitem_type%5D=topic&cd%5Bcategory_name%5D=Beyond Pyracy"/>