Jump to content

Ivan Henry aka Moose

Member
  • Posts

    486
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Ivan Henry aka Moose

  1. You know, I've looked at that page 100 times and never, until now, took note of the "1725" illustration. There it is! So the medium crown puritan hat looks to be good. Hmm... MANY THANKS!
  2. Oh... Thanks again! Do you know of any historic reference to the Puritan hat and pirates of 1700 forward? I am finding references to that hat 1640-1680 in some form or another, but nothing in the 1700s plus. Were these still worn at that time? As you can tell, I'm looking for an interesting and correct alternative to the ubiquitous tricorn.
  3. THANKS! Holy smokes though, $250 for a hat? That's very very nice, but might have to wait for a special occasion gift. Was it called "Puritan"? I have seen a reference to a Sugarloaf as well. Or is that something different?
  4. I'm back with more pirate fashion questions.... I'm really curious as to what those puritan looking hats that I've seen in a few illustrations (Pyle and others) are called, what is the history behind them (if any) and if anyone knows of a source for them. I have seen a UK re-enactor sporting one - it looked great. In the first pick there are two pirates on the left sporting them and the next, the pirate standing on the right.
  5. Thanks! I have been considering these: http://www.militaryheritage.com/musket16.htm and http://www.militaryheritage.com/musket8.htm Anyone have any opinions on those? I may also pick up a pistol. I'm fond of Queen Anne pistols, but honestly, I am open to suggestions seeing as I have not really seen any of this stuff in person. I am looking forward to it! Will you be in the Sutlers Row area? Thanks!
  6. Oh - I would like to buy a musket of some sorts and perhaps a pistol - I like the pricing of Loyalist Arms, so I guess I'm looking for a nice (Indian made) weapon. I was going to order, but thought it would be cool to actually hold and see what I might purchase.
  7. Thanks again Michael! Hey how's my stuff coming along? How are you doing after your accident? (sorry to get off topic).
  8. I'm saving my nickles and dimes for shopping at the HBBF and I was wondering if anybody has a Sutler's Row line up? I did hear that Black Bear Historical Clothing is going to be there. I was wondering specifically if there are vendor's like Loyalist Arms there. Specifically anyone selling non-firing weapons lke Loyalist Arms. Thanks!
  9. The Reenactment Shop sent me more pictures before I ordered. Here they are for reference. I should receive them this week.
  10. There it is! I have seen this before, but didn't take note of the stripe socks. Nice!
  11. well i ordered a pair. they were cool in sending additional pictures. Seems they do not have the correct sides, they are not hand stitched and the back isn't butt stitched, oh and the heel is low, but honestly, I think they are the most accurate off the shelf shoe for 1680 - 1730. They are rough out, have small D buckles, long tongues, and square toes. I'll report back when i receive them.
  12. Wikipedia has an article as well: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hand_mortar I particularly like this quote A lack of surviving specimens of this firearm indicate that it was not a popular weapon, possibly due to the safety issues. In his essay on the weapon, Hewitt opines that the mortar is among a variety of "projects for destruction which have never destroyed anything but the fortunes of their inventors."[3] In fact, under military exhibitions in The Official Report of the Calcutta International Exhibition, 1883-84 a hand mortar is described as "only a toy ... never intended for service."[4]
  13. Thanks as always Michael! You are quickly becoming my Authenticity Sensei! I had the same reservations about not seeing the soles or back of them and of not seeing their name mentioned in "shoe circles". I wouldn't bat an eyelash at seeing those at a GAoP re-enactment. They're actually pretty sharp shoes! That said, for those perfectionists who fret over the nitty gritty details, most of the detail that tends to seperate the earlier period shoes from the later mid-18th century shoes is in the side to hind quarters, which are completely not visible from that picture. The rather long tongure is a very good sign, but the profile of the side seam is usually one of the key details in seperating early from mid 18th century shoes... On the whole shoes are one of the items that the most leniency is given towards as there just aren't that many manufacturers, and most of the manufacturers that are trying to get it as close to possible for the GAoP, have extremely long waiting/ordering periods, or are really expensive, or both. Fugawees and/or Jardigans have kind of the de fatco standard for their comprimise in accuracy, price, and turnaround time, and you will likely find that a larger percentage of GAoP re-enactors wear the Fugawees or Jardigans than any other shoe. As for the above company, I've never dealt with them, nor have I heard from anyone who has.
  14. More shoe queries.... Are these more accurate for GAOP than the Fugawee Concords? http://www.re-enactmentshop.com/18e-Shoes.JPG Anyone delt with these guys before? Thanks again for all of your help!
  15. Hello, My lovely wife is working on a 1680-1720 mid-class riding/hunting habit. We have been unable to find a reference to footwear. While men wore boots while riding, did women of this time period do the same or did they wear something more typical for everyday dress (latchets, mules, etc.) Thanks!
  16. Wow - that's nice with the decorative edge - great work. Are you still or do you make these for other folks? If so I would really be interested in one. Let me know! Thanks.
  17. Would never hide from you, luv! As to the newbies, being one meself, I haven't much to say except try to be as period correct as possible and we'll all get along just dandy! Oh, and bring yer rum!! Okay so far (see my other posts) I need a new pair of shoes and no stripey socks, then there's Rum, no bucket boots, Rum, some more rum and more rum
  18. Thanks! I've been dong a lot researching lately, trying to build a good kit and as you've noticed as well, failed to see any evidence either way. Could they be a bigger faux pas than bucket boots on a historically correct effort?
  19. Just wondering if anyone has ever seen a reference to those stripey stockings I've seen people associate with pirate attire. I have yet to see aperiod drawing or a written reference to these. Any help?
  20. Thanks! I have checked out S3 as well - just having communication issues with them (they say they are having problems reading my e-mail. ?
×
×
  • Create New...
&ev=PageView&noscript=1"/>