Jump to content

Mortuary Sword


Jib

Recommended Posts

The mortuary sword, which fell out of use around 1670, has very close ties to the English Basket-hilt and is sometimes referred to as the English half-basket. This type was mainly a cavalry-issued weapon of both Royalist and Parliamentarian forces. In fact, it may be looked at as the great grandfather of 18th and 19th century cavalry sabers. Surviving examples are found both with broadsword blades and with single edged blades with part of the back edged sharpened to aid in thrusting. One of the best originals of this type of sword is one believed to have been owned by Oliver Cromwell—General of the Parliamentarian forces—and which now resides in the Royal Armouries, London.

From

http://www.myarmoury.com/review_ac_mort.html

I'm not much help otherwise lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The pommel of the sword was often carved into the likeness of a head. Frequently, this was taken as a memorial to His Martyred Majesty, Charles Stuart. This, however seems to be yet another piece of Victorian re-written history. The name does not seem to appear until the 19th century, and the swords certainly predate His Majesty's death in 1649.

Hawkyns

Cannon add dignity to what otherwise would be merely an ugly brawl

I do what I do for my own reasons.

I do not require anyone to follow me.

I do not require society's approval for my actions or beliefs.

if I am to be judged, let me be judged in the pure light of history, not the harsh glare of modern trends.

rod_21.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In addition, Paul Chen makes a great one for backsword practice and stage work. I own one of his; its light even with an intimidating blade....fast and comes to hand really well. Maestro Paul MacDonald has allowed them in his backsword classes and they can take a hell of a beating...though I don't reccommend it.

Monterey Jack

"yes I am a pirate 200 years too late,

the cannons don't thunder, there's nothin to plunder,

I'm an over-40 victim of fate,

arrivin too late.........."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The pommel of the sword was often carved into the likeness of a head. Frequently, this was taken as a memorial to His Martyred Majesty, Charles Stuart. This, however seems to be yet another piece of Victorian re-written history. The name does not seem to appear until the 19th century, and the swords certainly predate His Majesty's death in 1649.

Hawkyns

Never seen a Mort sword (even in the musuems) with the head on the pommel...I always understood it to be the face engraved in the hilt itself, which as you say was supposed to represent Charles I....never really looked like him, though...

Monterey Jack

"yes I am a pirate 200 years too late,

the cannons don't thunder, there's nothin to plunder,

I'm an over-40 victim of fate,

arrivin too late.........."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here be pictures of mine... a good, sturdy blade to be sure.

And folks are always right taken with it.

Mortuary2.jpg

Mortuary1.jpg

That's a Chen isn't it? Don't see the face on the guard though....

Monterey Jack

"yes I am a pirate 200 years too late,

the cannons don't thunder, there's nothin to plunder,

I'm an over-40 victim of fate,

arrivin too late.........."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Paul Chen is pretty, but in my estimation, its a bit light. It only weighs 2 pounds, whereas when I look through catalogues like the Wallace Collection, I find original weights for similar sword coming in at around 2lbs12oz, 2lbs8oz, and similar. Likewise, when I look at later variants of the cavalry sword, like the 1796 British Heavy Cavalry Sword (Sharpe's sword) being in the 3 pound range. 17th century basket hilts like the Irish hilt weigh as much as 4lbs2oz. Schiavonas weigh in at anywhere from 2lbs3oz up to 3lbs5oz. I'm much happier with my Armour Class mortuary which weighs in at a solid 3lbs.

Hawkyns

Cannon add dignity to what otherwise would be merely an ugly brawl

I do what I do for my own reasons.

I do not require anyone to follow me.

I do not require society's approval for my actions or beliefs.

if I am to be judged, let me be judged in the pure light of history, not the harsh glare of modern trends.

rod_21.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Paul Chen is pretty, but in my estimation, its a bit light. It only weighs 2 pounds, whereas when I look through catalogues like the Wallace Collection, I find original weights for similar sword coming in at around 2lbs12oz, 2lbs8oz, and similar. Likewise, when I look at later variants of the cavalry sword, like the 1796 British Heavy Cavalry Sword (Sharpe's sword) being in the 3 pound range. 17th century basket hilts like the Irish hilt weigh as much as 4lbs2oz. Schiavonas weigh in at anywhere from 2lbs3oz up to 3lbs5oz. I'm much happier with my Armour Class mortuary which weighs in at a solid 3lbs.

Hawkyns

As you shoudl be. Armour Class' version is right on the money. I have been a fan of their work for some time now.

 

-1st Mate of Pirates Magazine

-Bladesmith/Owner of That Works Studio

http://youtube.com/thatworks

thatworks.shop

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Paul Chen is pretty, but in my estimation, its a bit light. It only weighs 2 pounds, whereas when I look through catalogues like the Wallace Collection, I find original weights for similar sword coming in at around 2lbs12oz, 2lbs8oz, and similar. Likewise, when I look at later variants of the cavalry sword, like the 1796 British Heavy Cavalry Sword (Sharpe's sword) being in the 3 pound range. 17th century basket hilts like the Irish hilt weigh as much as 4lbs2oz. Schiavonas weigh in at anywhere from 2lbs3oz up to 3lbs5oz. I'm much happier with my Armour Class mortuary which weighs in at a solid 3lbs.

Hawkyns

The blades vary, actually to a small degree, and frankly I prefer one that caters to the lighter side and is still accurate. I don't really see where 8-12 ounces makes any difference. In Trained hands it shouldn't be an issue. On the other hand, 3 lbs or a bit more may come to hand for some. Keep in mind the "cavalry" sword is not a mort sword, and the weights you list are all within an acceptable range. Periosd specs varied according to the blade maker as well and the maker of all the furniture. The swords were rarely ever made entirely by one manufacturer. I would say , IMO that if you like the thing, and it conforms to decent specs (NO mort sword should weight in at 4lbs!) and holds up under the use you intend..buy it.

Monterey Jack

"yes I am a pirate 200 years too late,

the cannons don't thunder, there's nothin to plunder,

I'm an over-40 victim of fate,

arrivin too late.........."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yesterday after reading this I checked my copy of Swords and Blades of the American Revolution. They have 3 Mortuary Swords listed on pages 145 and 146. The wights are listed as 2 lbs, 2.1 lbs, 2.3 lbs and later version coming in under 2 lbs at 1.9 lbs.

The blades mounted in them are fullered and some are double and tripple fullered. They are similar to an early rapier blade more like an arming blade. Verry thin.

However I have held in my hands an original from about 1640 that was mounted with a wide broad sword blade. I have also seen examples of these swords that have been remounted several times.

 

-1st Mate of Pirates Magazine

-Bladesmith/Owner of That Works Studio

http://youtube.com/thatworks

thatworks.shop

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at those blades, I'd say 250 and 252 have lost blade weight due to corrosion and/or excessive sharpening. Neither blade is straight anymore. 251 puzzles me. Looking at it, it appears to be in reasonable shape so no loss like the previous two. Further examination of the picture shows, though, that it was made without the upper part of the basket and that the basket is relatively thin, in comparison to similar baskets. The blade is also shorter by a couple of inches. I'd have to say that it might have been a blade for a youth or smaller person, made lighter than the norm. 253 is listed as having an earlier blade, which definitely appears to be a cut down rapier blade.

Hawkyns

Cannon add dignity to what otherwise would be merely an ugly brawl

I do what I do for my own reasons.

I do not require anyone to follow me.

I do not require society's approval for my actions or beliefs.

if I am to be judged, let me be judged in the pure light of history, not the harsh glare of modern trends.

rod_21.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...