Theatre Vs Re-enactment.. must there be a choice????
I'm a thread-counting, hand-sewing, book-reading, research-crazy authenticity nazi - and proud of it.
I'm also a sawdust-in-the-veins dyed-in-the-wool theatre brat. Love performing. Heck, that's why I got into re-enactment in the first place - to combine my love of history with my love of performing.
If that's not everyone's cup of tea, then that's fine by me - it's a big ocean out there.
But in our group we try to be as accurate as possible AND as entertaining as possible.. and I think doing both is very possible - indeed we've proved it on many occassions!
We entertain kiddies, and adults, and we're obviously recoginisable as pirates to anyone who sees us - all of this while maintaining a high level of accuracy. I don't really see where the conflict is, to be honest, or why one thing would need to be sacrificed for the other.
The beautiful thing about re-enacting the Golden Age of Piracy is that, for the most part, what the general public think you ought to look like and what you actually are meant to look like are very, very close.. so where's the problem?
I have to admit I'm a little bewildered at the whole idea that you either have to be fun OR accurate... would that guy over there singing the pirate song be less fun if his shirt was linen? Or his hat wool, not acetate felt? Would he be less entertaining with leather soles on his shoes?? Would he be less fun if he were singing a funny song from the period??
No, no, and no.... that's my take on it, anyway....